Great mic!I am a stage singer in a rock band, with a wide range, and I like everything from the quiet breaths to the high belting to sound like I do in the shower. 🚿I was using the Shure MS58 and was not aware of what it lacked until my drummer 🥁offered me his mic to use. Wow!! What a difference! I had to have one of my own, immediately.Beautiful! Crisp! Clean! 🏵️Bear in mind, it is super cardioid, so be sure to have this right near your mouth and don’t stray from the path. Any offset of your aim and it may not pick up your voice as well as it could if you stay in line with the head of the mic. Background noise is little to none. Fantastic for a loud atmosphere. And durable as they get.Definitely worth every penny and then some!🥇

I use this whenever I lead worship at church and I love the warmth that comes through.

Bought this when it was on sale. Totally impressed with it. I will never go to another mic again. Very clear sounding mic that cuts through the mix. I was using Shure mics for years, but now I am a die hard E945 fan. Liked it so much, I bought a 2nd one as back up.

Já recebi muito bom estou testando mas recomendo sem sombra de dúvida!

Haven't used it, yet, but wanted to warn other customers that the packaging was non- existent. The item came in its box with a label, no wrapping, no tape. It could have easily fallen out of the box and been damaged.

Microfono splendido, soprattutto se cantate quasi attaccati al microfono, mantiene gli acuti belli e non vi mancherà mai presenza. Da lontano è un po' sottile rispetto ad altri. Se avete bisogno di un tuttofare, forse meglio il 935, cardioide e un po' più equilibrato come EQ. Comunque un bellissimo prodotto.

I already had my E935 and was happy with it but then I saw this one on sale one day and decided to give it a try. This is as much of a great quality mic as the E935, but supercardioid! The same beautiful, clear sound with a bit of a deeper range of sound pickup, love it! It's great to use for singing while playing an instrument, because you have that specific sweet spot to sing to without fearing about other sounds bleeding too much into the mix. And the materials and design are great, so it performs great but it also looks and feels great.

It is a great mic You have to spend the money to get a good mic

I now use this i er my Shure Beta 58. It sounds great!!!

I already had a Lewitt 440 pure cardiod condenser and I was on the fence of buying this mic because I thought if it doesn't match the same quality then I would be dejected and it kept up. You can use it in live performances and shows and it won't disappoint you. The super cardiod pattern won't be bothersome once you get used to it. Very clean and detailed vocals and no glaring distortion whatsoever. The product from this seller are genuine and I comformed it with official helpline and company as well so don't be skeptical of the discounts.

Este micrófono dinámico es excelente para voz en directo. No capta sonidos de instrumentos desde los lados y la voz es lo mas natural posible. Comparados con otros micros dinámicos supercardioides para vocalistas, Shure, Audix, AudioTechnica, Rode.. Elijo este ya que no necesita casi nada de ecualizador y la voz es real. Capta un gran rango de herzios comparado con las marcas anteriores.. este capta desde los 40 a 18.000 que es muy importante ya que capta un poquito mejor la voz grave.. Ninguna de la smarcas anteriores llega tan banjo como a 40hz. Solo encontre un microfono similar el Shure Beta58A, pero el Senheisser e945 es mejor en un 5% debido a que capta mas graves.. Pero si tienes la voz aguda y no te quieres gastar mucho el Shure Beta58a podria valerte igual de bien.

I have not heard a better sounding handheld, dynamic microphone. I have heard several that may sound just as good, some of which are much less expensive, but I can't say I've heard a better sounding one.The biggest drawback I see with this microphone is it seems to have a stronger tendency to feedback than any other I've tried. I evaluated both feedback from the side and back and made a subjective evaluation of this and the polar pattern, and my perception tells me the e945 has a fairly broad pattern for a supercardioid, about the same as what many cardioid mics like the SM58 have. Although the e945 has significantly more gain than a SM58, it still tended to be more likely to produce feedback from the side even when the additional gain was compensated for in comparison.It could be a great microphone where feedback is not a concern, or very likely, such as for recording or when the mic and monitors are in fixed locations and all precaution has been taken to avoid feedback.Comparing it to other dynamic vocal mics, I appreciate the e945 as quite possibly the best of them. I felt it was better than the Telefunken M80, the Beyerdynamic TG-V70D, and several Audix models, as well as the SM58. However, I am a lot more doubtful the e945 has anything worth the much greater price. Comparing careful recordings using studio-quality headphones, I could just barely perceive a difference in sound qualities compared to good microphones costing 1/3rd the price. I wasn't really able to identify anything that would convince me it is certainly worth three times as much money as an alternative. Many of the differences I did perceive could have been due to small changes in the gain, distance and proximity effect that I couldn't perfectly compensate for.I have a lot of long-term experience with Sennheiser microphones, and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them in general. You won't go wrong with this high-end microphone unless you have high stage volumes and feedback is a major concern, in which case you would be better off with a much tighter pattern.Everything else I can think of is mostly subjective, and based on my testing, mostly in your head. I think people believe one mic sounds better than another simply because they heard it with more gain, or with the amount of their preference of proximity effect. I compared several mics without EQ or other processing, but when you add the EQ and compression that is typical in live sound environments, and consider that the PA and the room probably have anything but a flat response, the sound of a mic is going to be totally different. Ideally, you might compare them in the venue where they're to be used, but if that's constantly changing, then what really makes one mic better than another? Some are more dependable than others, but one certainly doesn't need to spend over two hundred dollars to get a reliable mic.

I've been using the e945 for about six months now. I was previously using an SM58 Beta but found it wasn't cutting through as much as I wanted.Some background: I'm the lead singer in an indie/rock covers band. I'm singing over roughly three octaves as we cover a wide range of material. I'd been using the SM58 Beta very successfully until this band when I decided I needed something slightly different, particularly to pick up some of the lower melodies.The e945 has proven to be very successful both live and in rehearsal. It picks up all frequencies brilliantly and, as I've said before, does brilliantly on the lower end of my range where I'm not as powerful. Mic control is much easier and this is more forgiving than Shure mics for when you're caught in the moment and forget exactly where you're supposed to be!We play live a lot and it was important that this mic was rugged; no worries there. It's had a lot of use in the last six months and is still in perfect condition.This is an incredibly versatile microphone and is a definite alternative for Shure. I've since used it for acoustic music as well and found that it's easier to achieve the tone I want. Lovely.